Archive for September, 2011

Should I Use Copyright Law or Patent Law to Protect My Software

Copyright | Posted by
Sep 15 2011

Should I Use Copyright Law or Patent Law to Protect My Software

Throughout the evolution of patent law, case law destroyed the significance of . In addition to the statement that does not prevent against independent invention, but requires copying, menu edifices have been held to be not competent of copyright protection in a new case involving Lotus and Borland. Still, copyright protection can abide in addition to patent defence. Registration can supply some valuable benefits (e.G., provisions for attorney’s fees and statutory damages) at a cost of probable loss of trade secrets.

It is apparent that software patents are now here to stay, nonetheless of whether or not programmers wish for them to endure. The U.S. Supreme Court, in its latest Bilski conclusion, did not take the standpoint that software ought not be qualified to receive patent protection. If you encompass any doubts, merely go to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office website at and execute an agent search for any chief software company; you will realize that they possess many software patents. The law and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office practice regarding , where no processor is essential, is not fullly resolved. There is no questioning that software can now be guarded by patent law.

Patents lend effective protection in that they , and are in opposition to reverse engineering. Copyright protection guards against copying, but “clean room” practices can be used to circumvent copyright protection. Such a practice involves one team that or a depiction of how the software performs. A separate team, which is not presented access to the code, makes independent code established on the flowcharts or explanations. Copyright protection also private creation.

In reference to whether copyright should be counted on instead of , you should be aware that the courts are sternly restricting the power to apply copyright law to forestall infringement. In addition to the fact that copyright protection does not defend against independent invention, but requires copying, menu structures have been held to be not qualified of copyright defence in a justification battle involving

Nevertheless, a patent is not determined by a protection of independent development. Anyone making, using, or selling a is an infringer still, even though they had no understanding of the computer program. Whilst asked to distinguish the difference involving copyright and patent protection for his PC spreadsheet program, the inventor of Visi Calc was cited to state “With a patent the only difference would have been several hundred million dollars.”

Deepak Malhotra is a registered U.S. Patent attorney, and is also registered as a patent agent. He has a bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering as well as a law degree. Deepak assists clients in security software patents, business method patents, electrical patents, mechanical patents, and trademark registrations.

Source: ArticlesBase.com

Plagiarism- Your Rights Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act

Copyright | Posted by
Sep 10 2011

Plagiarism- Your Rights Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act

Plagiarism is an unbridled problem on the internet and the only specific protections for content owners are under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.  Passed by the Clinton administration in 1998, this copyright law seeks to protect writers, web developers and content owners from illegal infringement and plagiarism by extending the reach of copyright law, thereby offering recourses in order to prevent, stop, and report plagiarism.

Plagiarism is all too easy on the web, but the Digital Millennium Copyright Act makes it all too easy to have plagiarized work taken down.  Under the DMCA, internet service providers are protected from liability for acts of plagiarism by their users.  However, websites are exempt from this protection, and if you request to have plagiarized work taken down, website owners and administrators must immediately comply in order to avoid liability under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

]]>

Plagiarism and its Definitions: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act

Plagiarism and copyright infringement was more clearly defined by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to include cases where individuals circumvent measures put in place to prevent unauthorized access to materials or to prevent plagiarism.  Criminals that do this are subject to being tried, fined and incarcerated under the DMCA.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act also seeks to prevent plagiarism by preventing others from linking to plagiarized work.  While this legislation is currently in place, there have been no court cases involving a person being tried for linking to plagiarized work, unless that person was previously admonished for or found guilty of plagiarism.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act relies on the self-education of users to take action in specific steps, the easiest of which is to simply notify the webmaster of an offending site and request a take-down of plagiarized work.  This almost always achieves results, but if it does not, plagiarism can be pursued by contacting the Better Business Bureau, the State’s Attorney General Office, by reporting plagiarism to the major search engines, and by seeking litigation.

Unless you take steps to prevent, detect and report plagiarism, thieves will have no incentive to discontinue stealing your valuable content.  And if you think plagiarism isn’t happening to you, think again by visiting this link to learn more about the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and report plagiarism now.

Need to know more about plagiarism and how to report it?  Click here:

http://www.reportplagiarismnow.com/

 

Want to get expert SEO web content from the author who wrote this article?  Click here:

http://www.contentforconversions.com/contact-us/

Source: ArticlesBase.com